Program Monitoring And Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation ( M&E) is used to assess the performance of projects, institutions and programmes set up by governments,. Its goal is to improve current and future management of outputs, outcomes and impact. Monitoring is a continuous assessment of programmes based on early detailed information on the progress or delay of the ongoing assessed activities.
Program Monitoring And Evaluation Criteria And Instrument
An evaluation is an examination concerning the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and impact of activities in the light of specified objectives.Monitoring and evaluation processes can be managed by the donors financing the assessed activities, by an independent branch of the implementing organization, by the project managers or implementing team themselves and/or by a private company. The credibility and objectivity of monitoring and evaluation reports depend very much on the independence of the evaluators. Their expertise and independence is of major importance for the process to be successful.Many international organizations such as the, the and the have been utilizing this process for many years. The process is also growing in popularity in the developing countries where the governments have created their own national M&E systems to assess the development projects, the resource management and the government activities or administration. The developed countries are using this process to assess their own development and cooperation agencies. Contents.Evaluation The M&E is separated into two distinguished categories: evaluation and monitoring. An evaluation is a systematic and objective examination concerning the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and impact of activities in the light of specified objectives.
The idea in evaluating projects is to isolate errors in order to avoid repeating them and to underline and promote the successful mechanisms for current and future projects.An important goal of evaluation is to provide recommendations and lessons to the project managers and implementation teams that have worked on the projects and for the ones that will implement and work on similar projects.Evaluations are also indirectly a means to report to the donor about the activities implemented. It is a means to verify that the donated funds are being well managed and transparently spent.
The evaluators are supposed to check and analyse the budget lines and to report the findings in their work.Monitoring and Evaluation is also useful in the Facilities Hospitals, it enables the donors such as WHO,UNICEF to know whether the funds provided are well utilised in purchasing drugs and also equipments in the Hospitals.Monitor Monitoring is a continuous assessment that aims at providing all stakeholders with early detailed information on the progress or delay of the ongoing assessed activities. It is an oversight of the activity's implementation stage. Its purpose is to determine if the outputs, deliveries and schedules planned have been reached so that action can be taken to correct the deficiencies as quickly as possible.Good planning, combined with effective monitoring and evaluation, can play a major role in enhancing the effectiveness of development programs and projects. Good planning helps focus on the results that matter, while monitoring and evaluation help us learn from past successes and challenges and inform decision making so that current and future initiatives are better able to improve people's lives and expand their choices. Differences between monitoring and evaluation The common ground for monitoring and evaluation is that they are both management tools.
For monitoring, data and information collection for tracking progress according to the is gathered periodically which is not the case in evaluations for which the data and information collection is happening during or in view of the evaluation. The monitoring is a short term assessment and does not take into consideration the outcomes and impact unlike the evaluation process which also assesses the outcomes and sometime longer term impact. ^ United Nations development programme evaluation office - Handbook on Monitoring and Evaluating for Results. ^ A UNICEF Guide for Monitoring and Evaluation - Making a Difference. Center for Global Development. US Spending in Haiti: The Need for Greater Transparency and Accountability.
Retrieved 2014-05-27. United Nations Development Programme evaluation office - Handbook on Monitoring and Evaluating for Results. Prince Conway II; a M&E specialist from the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare was one of the those who achieved greatly in the health sector moving the Malaria data from 60% below base line to 85% above target. United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG). Archived from on 2013-11-05.
Retrieved 2014-05-27. CS1 maint: archived copy as title. United Nations Joint Inspection Unit.